I just learned today that Robert and Ashley Meek were going to get their Section 8 voucher. Gee, when I tried doing this stuff to help us get started seven years ago, she threw a fit and went back to her stupid little psychopath headgames.
I don't know what all the requirements are for this, but I bet they misrepresented some things. I bet they represented themselves as a family of 4, but Ashley usually leaves her other daughter with the daughter's father so she's not really responsible for her. Could I represent myself as a family of 2 since I have my daughter sometimes?
I also wonder if she made sure to mention the additional income that my daughter gets through me. They could have kept their last place, but they were just squatters. I doubt a voucher is going to change that aside from make their rent cheaper so that they don't have to worry about squandering their money.
My daughter was telling me about the little food they had and how she was hungry, but the money she gets through me should be enough to keep her not hungry for a month, plus some.
Either way, whoever rents to them is just asking for trouble. Their past few landlords have had issues with them, don't think much of them, and the one even liked me more than Mr. Meek.
These people don't deserve a break when all they have done is make my life a living hell while manipulating and brainwashing my daughter. She said to me the other day, out of the blue, that she wanted to be a loser--I mean landscaper like Mr. Meek, and that is only because of what they're telling her to say and do, among other things.
She also saw a sign on a window that said God is Love, and she started saying God is hate. It doesn't help any that she has a psychopath atheist and other psychopaths as her main influences, but if these are the people you want living around your other tenants, then that's your choice.
Unless you want somebody around who attempts to hit people with cars, lies in court, who the court thinks is "particularly obnoxious," who allow a five year old to be kicked when she doesn't do what her mother tells her to do, then you don't want them as your tenants. You can see a video of the court telling Mr. Meek they think he's obnoxious and don't believe that he's not a violent person at http://voicesforvermontchildren.com/achildsstory.htm. Rent at your own risk is all I can say, because they are unstable and in an equally unstable relationship where Mr. Meek is looking for and flirting with other women, and it was already rocky before they get married.
They will try saying stuff about me regarding 2002 when Mrs. Meek's friend pursued me and lied to me about her age just so that I would get a similar charge as Mrs. Meek's uncle, but that is all they have. Mrs. Meek constantly lies about knowing this person, but I noticed them on each other's Myspace pages in March, 2008, and in November, 2008, the friend said she was on the phone with Mrs. Meek, the night she started falsely accusing me again when Mrs. Meek and I had an upcoming Family Court hearing. Anybody who wants to believe these people, after the court even basically said Mr. Meek was misrepresenting/lying about himself, is naive and gullible and deserves what they get, especially when they start lying about other things, including anything they're involved in regarding other tenants of wherever they are. (The landlord of their one place was also the other tenant, and she seemed relieved to get rid of them.)
Perhaps if Mrs. Meek wasn't such a histrionic, narcisitic psychopath who posts everything on her profiles, then this wouldn't exist, but it does, because she is what she is.
There are more worthy people out there who deserve this assistance and a place over them.