(I had filed my Notice of Appeal after August 26, 2008, the date of the last trial court's ruling, after I had not seen my daughter since July 28, 2008. The idiot judge Mark Keller said they would have a hearing for evidence on my daughter's possessor's noncompliance. I thought that's what we were there for, and I didn't see the point in waiting for another hearing when I thought that's what we were there for, and the possessor had skipped a month's worth of visits. After he said he would have a hearing, I didn't see the point in having another hearing, wasting more taxpayer dollars (tens of thousands of dollars have been wasted in these matters, if you include everything to do with not only custody, but the conspiracy with false reports from December, 2005), so I just filed a Notice of Appeal, because my evidence would be no different, and my case has only evolved, unlike our judges.)

The VSC had previously told me that my printed brief was good enough, and they didn't need an oral argument, but I wanted to give one anyway. After I gave my argument, I thought they would do the right thing.

In their ruling, they said that I was saying the trial court erred in not holding a hearing for custody and contempt. I did not say that. I just said that I didn't need to waste another month waiting for another hearing for another lower court judge to do the wrong thing again and then appeal it, and my evidence wouldn't be any less.

In their ruling, they also said that I had only talked in one motion about how the possessor skpped "one visit." By the time I filed my notice of appeal she had skipped a month's worth of visits, and I even told them during my oral argument that I hadn't seen my daughter for seven months... I think I get more than one visit every seven months--I know that's what the last ruling said.

They also complained in their ruling about how I would file a motion everytime the possessor would increase her abuse around my daughter and me--I only filed so much because of what she's doing so much, but I had not filed since August, 2008 in anticipation that they would do the right thing, but was I wrong.

I can also show how they were wrong in upholding the violation, and it is a common sense thing-- in addition to the fact that they said their was no evidence saying I had an awareness of a Kristen Place's presence on January 31, 2006 when she and Mr. Ballard staked out the grange and attempted to enter after I did. I couldn't have self-reported it to my PO the very next day, if that was the case, but something is clearly lacking in these matters--in terms of people who handle matters that can effect many. (Grearson thought Rooney was a nice guy, and the VSC made the same dumb ruling he did, even though evidence shows their ruling is wrong.)

I also explained to them how my daughter's mother is an echo of Casey Anthony--a pathological lying psychopath. Neither of them care about anything and couldn't tell the truth to save their lives. The possessor just hasn't gone as far as Casey, but it could happen, because she cares less than Casey--they don't care about the harm they cause their children, and if it takes a step too far, then they will never tell the truth about what happened, because they feel no remorse, no regret, and just feel bad for themselves.

On a side note, I falsely confessed to everything. I couldn't contact the possessor because of the DWI3, where CPD knowingly let me drive 10 miles before doing anything, and then I met her friend, not knowing at the time, and we came out with the idea to lie so that my name might come out in the paper, and the possessor might contact me.

The friend and I lied and said we were together two times for that to happen, but I didn't realize that they were actually conspiring at the time. She and I went to the hospital for a suicide attempt, which I tried talking her out of, on the second and last day we were around each other. That's supposedly the second and last night we were together, but there is no DNA--I had really ineffective counsel, Richard Haesler, now city lawyer--replaced somebody who actually fought.

I also didn't realize the emotional impact it would take on me or that I would get sucked so deep into it, because of ineffective counsel, that I had to just stick with the story for so long in order to try to salvage my life. (The VSC supports perjury and lying, because they said there was "no compelling evidence" before them regarding a change of custody, what I was seeking in the appeal, not a hearing. Any jury I get, and I will get a couple, or a few, wasting more of your tax dollars, including everytime I have to file regarding my daughter, and it is just a waste to stop something that should have been stopped a long time ago--the abuse of my daughter and the conspiracy.

I went to the courthouse today to file motions for a hearing so I can start seeing my daughter again, but today was one of their early days, or closed days "to save money." They aren't saving taxpayers anything in doing that. The wheels of justice spin slowly enough, and the longer they aren't open, the more likely somebody is to sit in jail for that time, plus some, and that drains resources. Innocent people do get convicted and railroaded, and it could be somebody you know, and this is setting a dangerous precedent which I will fight until I can't anymore. How are they also saving money when I'm just filing more, and when they don't hold hearings when they can? They're not. It's a fraud, and so are the majority of the people in charge of the justice system.

This system really is a joke, and I hope everybody does jury trials, and representing yourselves would be just another way to put pressure on the system and lawyers to start doing the right thing, and it would really put pressure on the system, like it does to the people it victimizes--plead guilty to lies or we'll hang you. I love the presumption of innocence and old novel ideas of the system being about justice, but that's not what it's about anymore.

After what I have seen, the lack of common sense, I am convinced these people are just automotons, and those can be short-circuited. At least a computer could pick up much of what they have ignored--or I'm sorry, missed.

There needs to be something else, because this is a failing buddy system where people who don't care and like the suffering of others, psychopaths, get appointed and back up each other, and cults can be formed out of that. If somebody like the possessor can have "connections in the system," then those connections will do what they can for her and her family, and that has nothing to do with justice, and only an idiot wouldn't realize what's happening at this point.

The Supreme Court Justices ignoring this situation are Johnson, Skoglund, and Burgess. Burgess is the one who also ignored my concerns about my daughter and returned custody to the possessor when she wasn't doing what she was supposed to be doing without listening to my concerns. He listens as bad now as he did then.

Like I said, they said one visit, but by the time I filed my Notice of Appeal, it had been a month's worth of visits. These people need to learn math, ethics, and competence, if the latter two can actually be learned. They just wasted more of your money by doing this, because now I will just file more and more.

That kind of takes away from furlough Friday, which is just a fraud anyway. It doesn't save money when it slows down the wheels of justice more than what they are and a person or more sits in jail for that one extra day, or rather three extra days, since they could have been released on Friday instead of Monday. This whole thing is a fraud on the people, because it will not save you money, an it only jeopardizes an already poorly functioning system.

They don't care about how much you have to pay to keep people in jail, even if some people shouldn't be there. I could have been in there for 10 more years, but that wouldn't have accomplished anything aside from draining your tax dollars and further ruining my life while I've done nothing but try to get ahead while facing overwhelming odds.

The system likes making odds overwhelming, because then they can better take advantage of you and control society, which is why they are now charging teens as adults and sex offenses for "sexting" (sending nude text messages over the phone). The police said they are only doing it to a select few to make an example of them. So they will ruin a teen's life, most likely a girl's life for sending nudes of herself to a teen boy she might like. This is where responsible parenting comes in, and I know that charging these people is not to make an example of them--it is to see how long the system can get away with doing it before people start speaking out. If they don't speak out, then the system will continue doing it.

I mentioned responsible parenting but I know what the possessor is doing isn't responsible, and the picture of her slug husband with the dildo in front of him would only teach my daughter that kind of thing is okay, so my daughter, more than likely, is going to have problems when she gets older, but that doesn't mean she should be in trouble or charged with anything. The morons, including the Supreme Court, who have ignored this situation, while only trying to exacerbate it to put an end to it, are the ones who should be charged for anything my daughter might do since what's happening is extremely damaging to her, and anybody who doesn't see that is either a complete moron or a corrupt official.

This is why I'm a traditional anarchist, because the system doesn't work and shouldn't have any authority over me. For the past three years, I have just operated by my own laws and regulations, and I haven't been in any trouble, and that has nothing to do with the system-- they triec causing me problems by believing false reports, and anybody who couldn't see they were false really is below the Special Olympics.

Now, because of what the system has done, and realizing the VSC is potentially incompetent, I will be getting a few jury trials sooner and later. I don't know how much of your money that's going to save, and I will present all my evidence to the jury about the conspiracy, the same stuff the State and VSC have ignored. Well it's either ignored or they're incompetent, because my evidence is solid. Feel free to try to dispute my one brief that is also before the VSC waiting for a ruling, but be sure to do it with facts--you won't be able to. The State hasn't even responded to it, and I did falsely confess and commit perjury just to try to move on with my life, since I was already in too deep after the false confession to get my name in the paper so that the possessor might contact me since I couldn't have contact with her, because of a DWI3. The system is wasting your money and does not care, and it will waste your life, and it does not care.

Represent yourselves, because most lawyers, especially public defenders, do absolutely nothing. That is why they have unions, because it is a business. Justice is not business--businesses are for financial profit. Justice is not about money. If they get you a rotten deal, then you're likely to be a return client, keeping them employed. It would be better if what I'm saying is done, and the system will crumble after a year of the majority of people doing that. Take everything to jury trials. The system makes sentences so high to prevent this with plea deals, but if everybody did it, then the jury trials would be high, and the system would start to break down.

"Sex offenders" of America are the Jews of Nazi Germany, the witches of Salem, and all this is being done for is to later round up everybody with the label, including the teens who are now getting charged and put on lifetime registries, so that it will be easier for the government to control and take over society. Do you think that's going to lessen your taxes?

There is some serious prosecutorial abuse happening in the system, and there are no ethics in our courts. People get in there and abuse their power. These people are no different than that Ortloff guy or that congressman who solicited paiges--good covers. They ignore my daughter's abuse, because they are part of it, and there is no doubt there is some sort of cult in Vermont with how similar the behavior between the Places and Terjelians is, and how bad morons in the system are acting.

Just remember, if you're ever on a jury, you have the right to vote your conscience--do not listen to unethical judges who do not fully inform juries and just tell you to vote by the letter of the law. If that's what our founding father's had in mind with juries, then a computer could do it, but they did it, because the jury can nullify things by saying not guilty. If a person steals food to feed their kid, or something along those lines, then it is stealing--the law clearly says it's stealing, but what would your conscience tell you to do? The law is black and white--kind of like a psychopath's thinking, no grey area. The law has no emotion, kind of like a psychopath. So it has no emotion and no grey area, so how can it judge the emotional grey area known as life?

It can't, and it doesn't. Most of the people making life and death decisions, at least in Vermont, are psychopaths--they lie, don't care how it effects people, manipulate, and have absolutely no conscience, just like TJ Donnovan, who allowed Nichole Andreson, and two other prosecutors to be idiots and lie, or like Bill Sorrell who should have prosecuted them for prosecutorial abuse, among other things, but he is the biggest violator of civil rights in Vermont. Douglas doesn't care, because he is endorsed by CCA, and the more people who are in jail, the more his endorser makes, even if they don't belong there. He actually appointed Crawford, who ignored my sister almost being hit by a car and allowed to possessor to project and lie, which encouraged her to withhold my daughter from me for over a year. He also appointed Grearson, who went out of his way to wrongfully violate me, wasting your tax dollars by prolonging the hearing for seven months, rather than allowing for three extra hours or less for my witnesses to testify. That wasted your money. He is also the same moron who thought Brian Rooney looked like a nice guy. Douglas didn't care, because after Rooney, Douglas was right on television pushing for his civil commitment law. I believe Rooney was ignored and allowed to happen for that purpose only. Nice protecting society and preventing things from happening. The system actually works to make things happen, and they don't care as long as it serves their end purpose to control people and make more money by ruining their lives, including the teens who are being charged with sexting.

The law and the system are out of control and just dragging down society. Jails are where most of your tax dollars are going. They make more than the tobacco industry and what will happen when the ratio of prisoners is 1:50 Americans are in jail, including the sexting teens. I predict that by 2011, if nothing is done now, then the prison population will rise from 2.2 million people to 3 million.

Just some things to think about, because I have done nothing wrong since 2002, and that was only out of the conspiracy, but these goons have continued to do the wrong thing, knowingly, for my daughter, me, as well as the rest of society, and our representatives and senators need to start rethinking laws and penalties so that their laws don't make their constituents poor.