My daughter did also tell me on May 22, 2009 that she talked with the school guidance counselor, Jennifer Caron, on May 21, 2009, and she told her that May 1, 2009 made her "scared," but Ms. Caron just "ignored" her. I'll believe my daughter over any of them when they want to "keep" her (like she's an item to be kept), just like her selfish, psychopath for a mother does with her.

Would you trust your kids at a school where the staff side with abusers, lie, and make excuses? What could they possibly teach them there about problems solving when Mr. Alberghini can't figure out how the school's actions stuck them in the middle of this, or when they lie and don't look at the facts? (No wonder why Vermont's education system got an F. It's because of schools like this being considered the best when they are probably the worst. Of course "people" like these could wind up at any school, but when they are detected, they should be removed, and parents should consider homeschooling their children when this is the place you send your kids to school.)

This part is not in the lawsuit, because it's not important aside from maybe at trial, but when I told the school Co-Super Intendent, Jim Alberghini, that what happened on May 1, 2009 would stick in my daughter's mind for the rest of her life, and he said something to the effect of, 'I understand you feel that way.' That has nothing to do with the way I feel--it's a psychological fact, and he's an idiot if he thinks that has anything to do with my feelings.

I never received a ruling regarding adding Underhill Union ID School to my lawsuit for discrimination, but this is new, and they are now accessories to Mrs. Meek’s obstructive behavior with court orders, attemtping to eliminate me from my daughter’s life, to (try to) cause me distress, and to continue to manipulate and brainwash my daughter in not talking about their abuse of her, as well as cause her confusion and distress as well.

On May 1, 2009, I went to pick up my daughter for our weekend visit at 5:00. On our way there, I decided to check if a private number that had called me earlier in the day, while I was on the phone with somebody else, had left a message at 3:20—my phone was not informing me of messages, so I didn’t know, and I never answer private numbers.

When I checked to see if there was a message, it was Mrs. Meek informing me that my daughter would not be able to make the visit, because she had a school performance.

Mrs. Meek didn’t really say much on the voice message she left, and it sounded like the performance ended at 7:00, but it started at 7:00. At the end of the message, she said I could get Madison at 9:00 a.m the next day. Since we were already almost there, we decided we would go to the performance at the school too—we would have attended it anyway.

We arrived at the school around 5:00, and the principal, Cindy Mackin, saw us and waved and approached us in a friendly manner, and I got out of the car and spoke with her.

She informed me that the performance didn’t start until 7:00 and ended at 8:15. She also said 'this must be your visit,' and I explained to her the message Mrs. Meek left for me and that it was my weekend. She asked me if I was going to come back and pick up my daughter after the performance.

I kind of insinuated that I wanted to stay for the performance—she already knows I would sue them for discrimination, and she was trying it suggestively by asking me if I was going to come back. It didn’t really matter to me what she said anyway.

She asked me if Mrs. Meek knew I was going to be there, and I explained the message to her again and told her that Mrs. Meek didn’t know I was going to be there.

She told me not to create a scene, and I told her that I wouldn’t, but that I was worried about Mrs. Meek possibly yelling out “child molester” or other names, as she always does, around other people, and Ms. Mackin told me not to worry about Mrs. Meek doing that, and I emphasized how she didn’t have to worry about me doing anything and that Mrs. Meek was the one to start all this, again.

Mrs. Mackin then went to my mother and told her that she didn’t want any fighting between Mrs. Meek and myself, as she had just said to me, and my mother also informed her that Mrs. Meek was the one to start the fights.

We left the school to get something to eat and do other things until the performance.

So we (my mother, sister, and I) went to my daughter’s performance. She did not get there until after the performance started.

Mrs. Mackin most likely called Mrs. Meek and told her that she didn’t want her fighting with me. A subpoena for phone records will clear this one.

My daughter, as I said, did not arrive until after the performance started, and that is selfish to her just for Mrs. Meek to withhold her from me, which my daughter did not want.

As my daughter was starting to perfrom, she gave us a small wave as if trying to avoid notice. I couldn’t see Mrs. Meek, but shortly learned, from my sister, that she was standing against the wall by the gymnasium exit to the lobby.

After my daughter’s performance ended, I watched her two teachers, I don’t specifically know their names, escort her to another end of the band line that was closer to Mrs. Meek and allowing her to more easily get my daughter out of the school to avoid the visit.

I walked out of the gymnasium at Brown’s Middle School where the performance was, next to the UID school, and I saw Mrs. Mackin stooping down to my daughter saying something when I found them outside.

When I walked outside, Mrs. Mackin was stooping down saying something to my daughter while Mrs. Meek was standing right there. Mrs. Mackin then looked at me and walked Mrs. Meek and my daughter over from Brown’s Middle School to UID, which are on opposite sides of the parking lot.

Mrs. Mackin acted friendly to me, then, most likely, called up my daughter’s mother and told her the same thing she had told me— no fighting. (My daughter did confirm, the next day, that the principal had called Mrs. Meek, and that's why they were late, because Mrs. Meek wasn't going to bring her until the school called her back when they were late.)

Mrs. Mackin willingly helped Mrs. Meek avoid court ordered visits and created a lot of drama around my daughter that she didn't like, just so that Mrs. Meek could get her way, and not what my daughter wanted.

I watched the school for ½ hour, at least, and Mrs. Mackin walked by me in between two people. I tried talking to her, but she didn’t say a word to me. My sister tried approaching her, and she wouldn’t say anything to her and completely ignored her and walked away.

I was calling the police by the time I walked outside and Mrs. Meek and Mrs. Mackin were walking away with my daughter.

While I was speaking with the police, Mr. Meek pulled up with his abusive buddy, Mr. Patrick Duxbury (I thought it was him, but it is a new guy), who has kicked my daughter. (You should see Mr. Duxbury clenching his fists, on Court CD, after I finished reading his description, to his probation officer, of the environment the system continues to leave my daughter in.)

Once Mr. Meek pulled up, I saw Mrs. Meek with my daughter hand in hand run to the car, like they were trying to escape from something. After they ran out and were in the car, Mr. Meek sped right past me. (My sister also spoke of the style they were running out in and said that I missed a third person, "Michelle," running with them, and they were hovering over my daughter like trying to shield her from a warzone--combatant fire, and that is the style they were doing, but my sister did try speaking with Michelle afterwards, and she wouldn't give her an explanation of what just happened.)

When they left the school, they went the opposite direction from the direct route to their house. After I was off the phone with the police, we waited across the street from Mrs. Meek's residence until 9:15-9:30 to see if they would be back. They never returned to their residence until after we had left.

I spoke with the State Police later that evening, and they told me that Mrs. Meek had called them to give an excuse why she did this. They said she wanted to get Madison right to bed.

I could have brought Madison to the performance, and she could have went to bed right here, but instead, Mrs. Meek brought her to the performance late, left early, while the performance was still happening, and she did not bring my daughter directly to their residence.

This is just an ongoing part of their games to isolate my daughter, cause her insecurity, and prevent her from talking about their abuse of her. Now she can't trust school officials to do the right thing after this.

Mr. Duxbury has kicked my daughter, and I have seen bruises on her in the past from him kicking her.

I am also certain that Mrs. Mackin is bipolar. Only bipolar psychopaths side with bipolar psychopaths, and she made it seem like this was okay to my daughter, and she was doing things where more of a scene than just their hypodrama could have been created. I could have yelled to her while she was going to UID with my daughter and Mrs. Meek, after she said something to my daughter.

I picked up my daughter on May 2, 2009 at 9:00, and there was a different strange guy named Preston, who is now apparently living with Mrs. Meek and my daughter. She said they kicked Mr. Duxbury out, but she’s said that before, and he’s reappeared, but after what I did in court, I know he won't be back, but another strange man is.

I asked my daughter why she was late for the performance, and she did acknowledge that it was because Mrs. Mackin had called Mrs. Meek to tell her not start anything and she wasn’t going to go, but they called her in the middle of the performance and told her to come, and they helped her leave early. (My daughter also mentioned not liking Mrs. Mackin for some reason.)

My daughter did not like that she couldn’t be there for the whole performance, and it is only because of her selfish psychopath mother, if you can even consider her a "mother."

Madison also said that Mrs. Meek told her that she didn’t like us smiling at her at the performance—psychopathic selfishness.

She also informed us that Mrs. Meek brought her to her Nanna’s house to hide her from me, because she didn’t want her seeing me, because we have a better relationship, even after all this, because Mrs. Meek is a psycho.

There is no excuse for this, and it is just to hide my daughter’s abuse, and cause her distress and insecurity.

Mrs. Meek has lied so many times in court, along with her friend, Kristen Place, filing false reports against me and lying in court that they should also both be charged with conspiracy to commit perjury and file false reports to try to get me thrown in jail, or worse, so that I could never see my daughter or help her at all.

This whole situation is completely backwards and Mrs. Meek needs thrown in jail, and my daughter needs out of that pot smoke filled house where all they do is fight, and that is in an affidavit from Mr. Duxbury's probation officer regarding how he, a 38 year old man, said it wasn't "safe" for him there.

I am seriously concerned for my daughter's safety everytime I bring her back to that place, and something needs to be done, while something can still be done.

I also noticed that she was having some deep congestion problems, and that is because all they do is smoke around her, cigs and pot, which my daughter described as "something else" last summer during one of our visits.

Also regarding Underhill Union ID School, I had told them that I told my daughter that she could talk to them about anything she wants, and her mother wouldn't know, and I wouldn't know. I asked her recently if she had talked to the guidance counselor about what's going on around her and what she wants, and she told me that she has, but that it doesn't do any good.

The school guidance counselor, Mrs. Caron, also sent me a letter of recommendation for my daughter to get into counseling. I asked the guidance counselor what it was about, and she lied to me and said they had tried telling me at the meeting where they discriminated against me that they mentioned how Mrs. Meek had thought counseling would be a good idea for my daughter.

Then why is it just being recommended and not done? And why doesn't Mrs. Meek just do it if what the school said is the case?

Mrs. Meek needs charged and prosecuted to the fullest extent and held in contempt, and I need custody of my daughter, and the UID school needs in my lawsuit.

What happened on May 1, 2009 was exacerbated by UID school employees acting as accessories to Mrs. Meek's games, and that is extremely unprofessional.

On May 9, 2009, my sister and I received no trespassing orders for the Chittenden East School District, but we were not given reasons why.

There is no justifiable reason for these to have been placed on us. My daughter goes to the UID School and has performances there, and this is just the school assisting Mrs. Meek in eliminating me from things to do with my daughter.

I spoke with Trooper Crick of the Vermont State Police on May 10, 2009 to find out what this order was regarding, and she said that she didn't know. She also explained to me that she was waiting to meet with another trooper to put together the final case they wanted to hand in to the State's Attorney's Office.

Either way, there is no reasonable justification for the no trespass order. My daughter goes to school there, and my sister and I, as well as my mother, have done nothing more than go to see one of her performances, which I would always do, regardless, and this order needs vacated immediately so that I may go to other events or performances my daughter has.

Mrs. Meek brought her late and took her out early whereas I would let her have the enjoyment of the entire experience regardless of how I felt about Mrs. Meek, or whether it was her weekend. (She shouldn't be unsupervised with my daughter, and I know Madison has great fear there.)

What the UID School has done is reprehensible, and I hope somebody's listening.

Also, on May 1, 2009, after Mrs. Mackin and staff helped Mrs. Meek violate court ordered visits, I did call the school to speak with her, while waiting outside Mrs. Meek's residence to see if she returned. Somebody did answer, and I asked for Cindy Mackin, but they said she wasn't there and tried patching me through the voice mail. (I do believe it was Mrs. Mackin who answered.)

The phone hung up instead of patching me through to her voice mail, and I called back, but there was no answer. I left a message to the direct line telling Mrs. Mackin that I thought she was a bipolar psychopath, not acting in the interests of my daughter, and that I hoped she liked having her time tied up in lawsuits, because the events of May 1, 2009 were unjustifiable, and this no trespassing order, filed on Monday, May 4, 2009, served on my sister and me on May 9, 2009 is just in retaliation to the legal actions to which Mrs. Mackin's and staffs' actions resulted.

The Eastern School District, UID School, issued a no-trespass order against my sister and me, which we just received on May 9, 2009.

There is no reason for this other than the scene Mrs. Mackin and other school staff helped create for my daughter by favoring Mrs. Meek and not acting as neutral mandated reporters. If it wasn't for them helping Mrs. Meek be in contempt of court ordered visits, then none of May 1, 2009 would have happened, and it was nothing more on my part than following them outside, calling the police, and that's it. My sister asked them questions, but you would ask questions too.)

The school employees, not acting as neutral mandated reporters, favored Mrs. Meek, did not act in my daughter's interests, and she did tell them that she wanted to stay for the performance and wanted to know why she couldn't go with me. That is not acting in her best interests, and the school is discriminating against me when all they did was help Mrs. Meek sneak my daughter out of the performance, and I got up and followed them outside, along with my mother and sister.

Had UID School employees acted in my daughter's interests, not favoring her mother violating court ordered visits, then none of this would have happened.

I had every right to be at my daughter's performance, and I have every right to be at every future performance or event my daughter is involved in at the school.

I am suing the school for discrimination for not respecting my rights as Madison's father and creating a very confusing situation for her, as well as causing her trust issues when they wouldn't listen to what she wanted.

None of what they are doing is acting in the interests of my daughter, just like when she told the guidance counselor, Jennifer Caron, what she wanted, but "it doesn't do any good." That's just because they are being biased and discriminating against me, because of my mislabel, because of Mrs. Meek's friend, Ms. Place, which I showed the UID employees in August, 2008.

They are not acting as mandated reporters for my daughter, and there is no reason for it after I explained to them the circumstances and showed them actual physical evidence.

This is just further proof of discrimination. My daughter doesn't even like Mrs. Mackin for some reason, and all I can think is that these people are no better than Mrs. Meek, a person who would be diagnosed as a psychopath within a month of counseling sessions, and I have had no choice but to just start pointing out some of reality and truth to my daughter when all I wanted was just to see her.

I spoke with John Alberghini, Eastern School District co-super intendent, and asked him why the no-trespass order was issued.

He claimed that school staff said that my sister and I were yelling at them and calling them names on school property.

I was on the phone with the police most of the time, and I maybe tried asking Mrs. Mackin one time what was happening. My sister tried asking her a bunch of times, but all she did was ignore my sister.

He also said that the staff alleged that my sister stuck her foot in a door to prevent them from closing it, but I wasn't near my sister to account for this. (She said she stuck her hand on the door once.)

Mr. Alberghini also said that the message I had left was grounds for the no-trespass order. He said that I said "I hope you like surprises," and nothing else. He said, "That could mean a lot of things."

I could have sworn I said, "I hope you like your time tied up in court, because you're in for a big surprise [the lawsuit]," and I also said that he had received copies of the lawsuit I had previously tried filing, and if I said "surprise," then that was the "surprise," but I'm pretty sure that I didn't phrase it that way. (I didn't remember saying the end while talking to him, but the time in court and lawsuit should have been clues as to the "surprise" I was speaking of, and he still didn't seem to comprehend it and made excuses that it could have been taken anyway. Not when I say "time tied up in court," and they get a lawsuit within a few days of the message.)

When I mentioned to him that what Mrs. Mackin did--how she helped Mrs. Meek violate court ordered visits and wouldn't listen to my daughter, he said that that was between Mrs. Meek, the court, DCF, and me.

I informed him that Mrs. Mackin was aware it was my weekend, and she put them (herself and school staff) in the middle of it by not acting as neutral mandated reporters, and that they were discriminating against me and not acting in the interests of my daughter when she wanted to stay for the performance and go with me.

He said that was an unfair take on my part, because I didn't know how many times they have contacted DCF regarding my daughter, which neither he nor DCF would be able to tell me anyway.

That sounds just like the guidance counselor, Jennifer Caron, when she tried telling me that Mrs. Meek thought counseling would be a good idea for my daughter, and that's why they recommended it.

That's a lie, because if "Mrs Meek thought counseling would be a good idea" for Madison, then the school wouldn't need to recommend it, Mrs. Meek could just take her.

(If what Mr. Alberghini told me about the DCF reports is the truth, then why did they help one of my daughter's abusers violate court ordered visits? If they are looking out for the interests of my daughter, then why did they (Mrs. Mackin and other staff) create a very confusing situation for my daughter and that made her nervous and cause her trust issues when they wouldn't listen to her? Why wouldn't they listen to her?)

No matter how much I tried telling him that the school put themselves in the middle of it, he said that Mrs. Meek was the custodial parent, and they had to do what she wanted. (How's that in my daughter's interests?) A court order overrules that, and Mrs. Mackin and staff knowingly helped Mrs. Meek avoid it, and that put them in the middle of it.

No matter what way you look at it, May 1, 2009 would never have occurred had Mrs. Mackin and other staff not had their discriminating views of me and helped one of my daughter's abusers violate court ordered visits.

There was no scene from my sister or me other than trying to ask questions, while they ignored us, and I was on the phone mostly. (I just wanted to deal with the police, not any of the school staff, but my sister wanted answers. Asking what's happening is not creating a scene, and that would have never been asked had Mrs. Mackin and staff not helped Mrs. Meek avoid court ordered visists. If Mr. Alberghini does not understand that's putting them in the middle, then his reasoning is seriously flawed.)

Why didn't they just answer then that that's what Mrs. Meek wanted and they had to abide by what the custodial parent wanted? (It's court ordered--Mrs. Meek wants me "to have nothing to do with [my daughter]," but that doesn't overrule a court order. A court order overrules what the custodial parent wants, and she shouldn't be anyway, and they sided with her, even when they're making reports to DCF about things, and it has to be about my daughter's other environment, which was nicely described by a now former roommate of their's, Patrick Duxbury, in his probation officer's affidavit and adendum, and he's the one who has kicked my daughter.)

(Mr. Alberghini did also say that my calling Mrs. Mackin a bipolar psychopath is threatening. It's actually a diagnosis, and I studied psychopaths and other disorders. I know for certain that Mr. Meek is bipolar and a psychopath, and Mrs. Meek is a psychopath with histrionic and narcisistic traits, and I always say birds of a feather flock together. Either way, stating something that could be considered a psychological diagnosis is not a valid reason for a NTO--it is not a threat.)

I also know the school does like my daughter and they want to "keep" her, which they told me at the last conference.

And I know my daughter has tried telling Mrs. Caron, the guidance counselor, what she wants, as well, but "it doesn't do any good."

If they want to "keep" her, then they will more than likely operate for that rather than the interests of my daughter, which is evident by them siding with Mrs. Meek, going against my daughter's wishes and interests, against a court order, and lying to me about certain things such as the recommendation for counseling when Mrs. Caron told me it was because Mrs. Meek "thought it would be a good idea."